32-bit, I never managed to compile a 64-bit version, and since I don't need one myself I didn't spend a lot of effort on getting one. Feel free to use Brodie's working src archives here: http://code.jellycan.com/memcached/ to compile one yourself.
/Henrik Schröder On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Josef Finsel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is that the 64 bit or 32 bit version? > > Thanks > > > "If you see a whole thing - it seems that it's always beautiful. Planets, > lives... But up close a world's all dirt and rocks. And day to day, life's a > hard job, you get tired, you lose the pattern." > Ursula K. Le Guin > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:55 AM, Henrik Schröder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I put up an archive at >> http://code.google.com/p/beitmemcached/downloads/list, grab it from there >> and test it out. Would love to get more people testing it so we know if the >> weird CPU usage is gone for good. >> >> >> /Henrik Schröder >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Stephen Johnston < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> I would be very much interested in a Windows Binary that didn't eat up >>> one of our cores. >>> >>> -Stephen >>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Henrik Schröder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Henrik Schröder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Jeff Rodenburg < >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Henrik - can you elaborate on what you've found with this? I'm not >>>>>> looking to resolve the issues, just trying to get a better picture of >>>>>> where >>>>>> the bodies are buried, and to convince an all-windows shop that it's OK >>>>>> to >>>>>> run a few linux instances to support certain application services. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On our current project, we run memcached on two servers that are also >>>>> web servers, and on both machines the memcached process consumes exactly >>>>> 25% >>>>> CPU. The weird thing is that those two servers have different hardware. >>>>> One >>>>> is a two-processor dual core Xeon at 2,5GHz, and the other is a >>>>> two-processor dual core Xeon at 1,6GHz. The first one runs Windows Server >>>>> 2008, the other Windows Server 2003. But the memcached process on each >>>>> takes >>>>> up exactly 25% CPU all the time. I can also see on the stats that the >>>>> second >>>>> server gets more memcached traffic than the first one, so the second >>>>> server >>>>> is slower than the first and gets more traffic, but the CPU use is 25% on >>>>> both servers. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Ok, thanks to Brodie Thiesfield who managed to produce working Visual >>>> Studio projects of Libevent 1.4.4 and Memcached 1.2.5, I've compiled my own >>>> version. I took his project, added the old memcached icon (These things are >>>> important! :) ), fixed a file version number, and compiled everything in my >>>> Visual Studio 2005 with whatever optimizations it can do, and finally got >>>> to >>>> deploy this version live. >>>> >>>> It's been running for a day now, and so far it looks good, still at 0% >>>> CPU utilization so hopefully whatever problems the older windows versions >>>> of >>>> memcached had are gone. I'll let it run for a week, and if it's still >>>> behaving after that time, I'll try to make available our binary for those >>>> that are interested. >>>> >>>> >>>> /Henrik Schröder >>>> >>> >> >> >> > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "memcached" group. > To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/memcached?hl=en > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > >
