The Arabic version of "net" would come at the beginning of the domain name, as 
we don't have an equivalent of "www". Thus in Oman's case it would still end in 
.oman in Arabic.

IMO, as techies we may not be the best ones to judge which is better, ie. to 
keep an equivalent of www or drop it. The domain name's marketing staff should 
decide on this, with the aim of gaining more interest to their website if 
promoting an Arabic IDN. Registrar's may provide both options to their 
customers to encourage Arabic IDN adoption.

Regards,
-Ahmed


On 2013-10-28, at 8:05 AM, Timothy Roy <[email protected]> wrote:

> I believe that the Arabic version of net would cause more confusion. I think 
> that keeping simpler is better. I know that here in Oman we have been pushing 
> and promoting the .oman(Arabic) IDN quite extensively.
>  
> I also believe that for an organization to actually have the Arabic content 
> and URL they need to access their market. If they want to reach or promote 
> their business to the MENOG regions (or regions of their specific country) 
> that have a lesser comprehension of English language then they should go for 
> it.  As a registry we are trying to promote it but it is mainly up to the 
> Registrars to promote it to obtain more business in this field of domain 
> names.
>  
> My quick observations.
>  
> Best Regards
>  
> Timothy Roy
> Regulatory and Compliance Unit
> Domain Name Operations
> Telecommunications Regulatory Authority.
> Tel: +968 24574858
> Mobile: +968 93551117
> Email: [email protected]
> Office hours: Sunday – Thursday, 7:30am – 3:00pm (Muscat GMT +4)
>  
>  
>  
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Ahmed Abu-Abed
> Sent: 28 October 2013 08:55
> To: Fahd Batayneh
> Cc: menog@menog. net
> Subject: Re: [menog] New Arabic TLD and idea's popularity
>  
> I agree, the term “www” may seem redundant at first look, but it certainly 
> indicates what is coming next is a web site. In other words, it is like a 
> “Mr.” or “Dr.” title that give you a rough idea of the person you are 
> referring to.
> Should we have an Arabic “www” equivalent to grab peoples attention to Arabic 
> IDN ? Something like نت  (translated into “net”) so instead of عمان.الاردن  
> the website owner should promote   نت.عمان..الاردن
>  
> This will likely get more attention to Arabic IDNs.
>  
> My 0.02 Dinar thoughts ...
>  
> -Ahmed
>  
>  
> From: Fahd Batayneh
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 12:23 AM
> To: Ahmed Abu-Abed
> Cc: mailto:[email protected]
> Subject: RE: [menog] New Arabic TLD and idea's popularity
>  
> I have actually seen Arabic URLs posted in public areas in the UAE, yet it is 
> not gaining the marketing advantages it seeks.
>  
> There have been discussions within New gTLD applicants on whether to 
> encourage New gTLD registrants (once these new gTLDs are delegated and are 
> generally available) to advertise their online presence using “www” in front 
> of the URL or not; i.e. www.menog.anything vs. menog.anything. For those who 
> might not know, the inventor of the term “www” in front of URLs has admitted 
> that such an addition was a mistake in the first place. Yet, after thorough 
> discussions, those involved have concluded that in order for people to 
> understand what menog.anything is, it is best that “www” is added in front of 
> the URL for advertising purposes. I believe this to be the case for IDNs we 
> well; i.e. some just don’t understand what مثال.اختبار is.
>  
> My 2 cents.
>  
> Fahd
>  
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Ahmed Abu-Abed
> Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2013 9:51 PM
> To: Tom Paseka
> Cc: menog@menog. net
> Subject: Re: [menog] New Arabic TLD and idea's popularity
>  
> Hi Tom,
>  
> Country code TLDs have been available since 2010 for 4 Arab countries at 
> least. Unfortunately its not on most peoples priority list for implementing, 
> and I have not noticed any advertising for an Arabic URL over the past couple 
> of years (I live in the MENOG region).
>  
> As for CloudFlares IDNs, it would be good to filter out which are using the 
> Arabic alphabet and know how many Arabic IDNs are actually out there. That 
> would require a good understanding of Punycode used to translate an IDN into 
> Latin characters.
>  
> Regards,
> -Ahmed
>  
>  
> From: Tom Paseka
> Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2013 7:20 PM
> To: Ahmed Abu-Abed
> Cc: mailto:[email protected]
> Subject: Re: [menog] New Arabic TLD and idea's popularity
>  
> Hi Ahmed,
>  
> I've had a look through CloudFlare's customers and we see thousands of IDN's, 
> but this is nothing compared to what exists in pre-existing romanized domains.
>  
> For a pre-existing company to move to a IDN, or any new domain in general, 
> they have to revamp their presence, re-market to everyone to make sure they 
> visit the correct address. I assume this isn't an easy task.
>  
> I suspect you'll see new starters coming out from the get-go with an IDN, but 
> it'll take a while for the existing content to start adoption.
>  
> Cheers,
> Tom
>  
> 
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Ahmed Abu-Abed <[email protected]> wrote:
> ICANN is in the news with the new شبكة  TLD, see 
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-24637673
>  
> I am yet to see Arabic TLDs widely implemented, although most browsers are 
> ready, even on iOS and Android which I tested with an Arabic URL. Any idea on 
> why is the delay in implementing Arabic URL by content providers (newspapers, 
> etc.) ? People in the region prefer Arabic websites, so I am wondering what’s 
> stopping content providers from having Arabic URLs.
>  
> Also, anyone know if major portals, like Google or Yahoo, have implemented 
> IDNs in any language for their URL ? Something like ياهو.شبكة  (which 
> translates to Yahoo.net , as I cannot find an equivalent to .com as an Arabic 
> TLD).
>  
> Best Regards,
> Ahmed Abu-Abed
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Menog mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.menog.org/mailman/listinfo/menog
_______________________________________________
Menog mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.menog.org/mailman/listinfo/menog

Reply via email to