On Monday 04 June 2012, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Monday, June 4, 2012 11:49:41 Marco Martin wrote: > > yeah, seems that connman or networkmanager support is statically linked > > in the packagekit daemon and not a plugin, so doesn't seem possible to > > have both backends compled and installed at runtime :/ > > so here's the next obvious question: why is conman still in Mer? :) > > it really does not make much sense to have 2 backends mantained unless > there is a significant advantage unique to each one. right now, the only > advantage i know of is that conman is not actively developed? :)
have a packagekit here that uses networkmanager: https://build.pub.meego.com/package/show?package=PackageKit&project=home%3Amart%3Abranches%3AProject%3AKDE%3ADevel about connman i think is still alive as part of tizen, but not exactly developed in the open.. personally i think moving to networkmanager at mer level as well would be more future proof, i guess the resiztence at the moment is that the other ui projects have ui only for connman? Cheers, Marco Martin
