2012/6/5 Marco Martin <[email protected]>: > On Monday 04 June 2012, Marko Saukko wrote: >> On 04.06.2012 17:20, Marco Martin wrote: >> > On Monday 04 June 2012, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: >> >> On Monday, June 4, 2012 11:49:41 Marco Martin wrote: > a combination of 3 things, familiarity, having something already done ui wise > and not too much trust in Intel and dependency on tizen parts (i know is sad, > but is a feeling of if it's happened once it can happen again) > > again, i really hope to be wrong on that and that there will be work on it by > several players.
FWIW, ConnMan isn't a 'tizen part' - I think after all the distribution flip-flopping Intel OTC decided to go for the sane path and have a seperate community for their various components that have use in other distros. See http://01.org - connman and ofono is part there. That said, can somebody please deliver me a list of build/runtime dependencies for NetworkManager on top of Mer Core and footprint information? Architectural decisions should be based on actual data if possible. It's my personal opinion that it's difficult to compete with ConnMan in mobile OS context in these areas, but I'd like to be proven wrong too - so let's get this properly evaluated. Keep in mind that Mer is done in such a way that if you'd like to derive Mer and build your own with some architectural changes, you are more than able to do so and we even encourage it and try to make it easier. It's difficult to do one-size-fits-all in mobile cores - and we don't want to include the kitchen sink either, so there's a delicate balance. /Carsten
