On 7 Sep 2008, at 21:11, Mike Pence wrote:
> Does anyone have performance numbers for merb on jruby vs. MRI vs. > Ruby1.9? > > Is merb on Ruby1.9 stable enough at this point for actual development > and production deployment? I wouldn't use it, there is not even an official stable release yet, 1.9.1 is only in the RC status. Maybe it will work, maybe it won't, but personally I wouldn't trust it yet. Also I don't know whether 1.9 compatibility has been an active goal for Merb. JRuby should be 100% compatible with MRI, so stuff that won't work can be considered a bug and my experience with the JRuby guys is that they are pretty quick in fixing things. So I think this is more of a viable target then 1.9 atm and JRuby performance is already at the same level. I'm going to setup a CI box for Merb in the near future and hopefully install a few runtimes so the tests run on all of them. This should also help in staying compatible with different runtimes. -- Regards, Dirkjan Bussink --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
