er This suddenly turns OT, but wasn't Ruby 1.9.0 released Dec 25th 2007?
check out ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.0-0.tar.bz2 On Sep 7, 2008, at 4:40 PM, Julian Leviston wrote: > > Sorry I should have said Ruby 1.9 will be frozen at about the end of > September, so not long to wait. > > Julian. > > > On 08/09/2008, at 5:11 AM, Mike Pence wrote: > >> >> Does anyone have performance numbers for merb on jruby vs. MRI vs. >> Ruby1.9? >> >> Is merb on Ruby1.9 stable enough at this point for actual development >> and production deployment? >> >> I am about to begin development on a big merb project, and I am not >> really sure which runtime to embrace. >> >> Best, >> Mike Pence >> >> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Viktors Rotanovs >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Dick Davies wrote: >>>> Does anyone have any tips for getting merb (0.9.5) to run on JRuby >>>> (1.1.4)? >>>> >>>> My current showstopper (there's been a few) is that merb (merb- >>>> gen at least) >>>> needs libxml-ruby, which is a native gem. >>> >>> Remove dependency while installing from source: >>> 1) git clone git://github.com/wycats/merb-core.git >>> 2) git checkout tags/v0.9.5 >>> 3) in Rakefile, comment out the following line: >>> s.add_development_dependency "libxml-ruby" >>> >>> Hope that helps. >>> >>> -- viktors | http://rotanovs.com >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> > > > > > !DSPAM:48c466a2257547224784171! > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
