Oh ;-) I thought that was just a spinoff effect of slices, and slices were more about allowing you to pack up your OWN code into little chunks that could be re-used wherever you liked...
Julian. On 17/11/2008, at 1:57 AM, Ted Han wrote: > > Er, this is the whole point of slices. I know a number of people who > are building slices to do various things, that haven't been release > cause they're still in the works. There's going to be a bit of lag > time, since 1.0 was only released last week. we'll have to wait for > the rest of the community to catch up. But i think everyone agrees > that sharing is for the win :) > > also, the core team member's blogs are all word press :P there isn't a > blogging platform out there on merb yet. > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Julian Leviston > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Sorry but isn't merb a code-sharing feat in itself? It's a component- >> based framework, which is essentially an effort to share as much code >> as possible. >> >> Are you talking about sharing domain-specific-level code? (in other >> words, code that solves specific problems, as averse to general >> application-building code)? >> >> Julian. >> >> On 17/11/2008, at 12:15 AM, DAddYE wrote: >> >>> >>> Hello to all, >>> >>> I've a very big question... >>> >>> Can we share our code? >>> >>> One of the problems more large we meet now is to find projects >>> opensource project to inspect for take confidence with merb. >>> >>> Member core team have their own project like blog, site etc... to >>> share? >>> >>> We need a good starting point. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
