Does anyone have info on how exactly to do this? A photo, pointing to
the area in question, sure would be nice. I had been under the
impression a major valve body mod was needed. Perhaps the 722.4 tranny
can be easily modified, but the 722.3 cannot, or vice-versa? I'd love
to know more about this... drives me batty on my 1986 300E.

:)

-dm

> ------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:24:10 EST
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] 1st
>
>
>> "In the early '90s Mercedes saw the error of their ways and allowed the
>> gas transmissions to start in 1st. Cars built a year or two before 1st gear
>> starts became standard COULD be converted (it was NOT a cheap
>> conversion - required that the valve body be removed and some pieces
>> replaced) but cars with transmissions build before that (about '89 and
>> earlier I think) can't be converted (you'd need a completely replace the
>> valve body)."
>
> If I had any personal archives, I could exhume a post I made more than ten
> years back on this subject but I don't, so I won't. Paraphrasing, when I was
> driving my '89 190E 2.6 and my friend SJB got his new '91 300E with 1st gear
> start and I drove it, I was hot to add that feature to my '89. So, after 
> repeated
> talks with one of the two MB reps in my area, one of them called Montvale, in
> my presence, and asked what could be done. The answer was that they had
> converted several company cars and the fix was to remove the little spring 
> from
> behind the kickdown piston. Soon after, the shop foreman, with me watching,
> removed the valve body (a few fasteners), removed one of the cheesehead
> screws from the end of it (they are numbered) and out dropped a little piston
> followed by the spring in question. Reassemble in reverse order. After a 
> careful
> adjustment of the trans cable (or was it a rod?) I had first gear start. What 
> a
> difference!
>
> I carried that little spring in a zip-loc bag in the car for a few years
> until I traded it of in '95.
>
> Probably cost about $150 including the fluid change.
>
> RLE

Reply via email to