Norway - back in the late 60s - had the same draconian drunk driving laws. The police can visit you to administer a breathalyzer test; if you fail and your car engine is still warm, you're outta luck.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 12:27 PM Randy Bennell via Mercedes < mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > On 16/07/2019 11:10 AM, Curt Raymond via Mercedes wrote: > > Is that evidence always admissible in court? In Canada do you have the > right to know your accuser? Has this yet been used in a weaponized fashion? > > Seems like reporting the lawmakers who started the law would be a really > interesting thing, it'd hassle them if nothing else. I'm interested in > those cases where lawmakers get caught up in their own laws. > > > > -Curt > > > Some of these cases have been successfully fought but at considerable > expense to the person charged. There is some talk of a constitutional > challenge but I think there is hope that the Liberal government will be > voted out this fall and the Conservatives will amend the law. > > _______________________________________ > http://www.okiebenz.com > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > > _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
