Thanks Karl, I took a quick look at the first three on your list.  The
first discusses the fluid flow of droplets from coughing and sneezing, and
yes that is pretty much common sense that if one is coughing / sneezing
then wearing a mask is a good thing.  No argument there.  Even better, do
what has always been recommended
by medical professionals: Stay home when you are sick!

The second paper relies on a lot of assumptions and estimates and (here we
go again) models to reach their conclusions.  We all know how dishonest
researchers can manipulate the models (see global warming) to get the
results we want.  No thanks.

The third paper is not yet peer reviewed but strongly recommends that
countries that had their populations wear masks saw a large decrease in the
infection rate.  However some countries that did not impose mask wearing
also did not suffer high infection rates.  Hmmm, that is a curious bit of
data, what could be going on there?  My guess: this paper does not account
for differences in medical treatment regimens (use of HCQ and Budesonide
and other treatments).  I like this paper, but I think they need to re-run
their models and take into account the factor of medical treatment.  This
one has promise for actually producing good science to support mask wearing
(to be determined yet), and I like that they also take into account border
closings (86% decrease in mortality rate when international travel was
restricted) and testing / tracing (did not significantly reduce mortality
rate).  Obesity and an older population are also major factors in an
increased mortality rate.

So, are masks effective?  I think they are, they certainly can reduce the
infection rate.  How effective, and how much liberty do we give away in the
interest of reducing the risk of living?  I'd much rather that our elected
representatives focus on providing the public with reliable information on
individual actions that will reduce the infection rate, promoting good
hygiene practices, and making possible the medical treatments that are safe
and effective.  The use of bad models and the confusing and contradictory
advice from "experts" has severely damaged the public's faith in
government.  Personally, if I become ill with this disease, I'll ask my
doctor about HCQ and Budesonide as treatment options.  Until then, life is
worth living so let's get on with it.
-------------
Max
Charleston SC


On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 11:05 PM Karl Wittnebel via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:

> I think the imposition to liberty here is very minimal. It's not like they
> are bringing back the Stamp Act, or requiring vaccination. It's like
> wearing a seatbelt or something. I will be happy not to wear the masks but
> we have some work to do as a society to get there.
>
> I can see how people with little direct exposure to this illness might
> think the risk is minimal. We are seeing these sorts of attitudes change
> with increased disease prevalence in affected areas e.g. Texas.
>
> To Don's point, until the prevalence in your immediate area is below about
> 1.5%, it's probably a good idea to do what you can. I have five people in
> house right now with it. One is a 43yo RN with a 7yo daughter who tested
> positive a few days ago and was toughing it out at home but could not
> breathe well so came in satting 82%. She is doing OK on a few liters of
> oxygen. Three are guys in their 50s and 60s with no predisposing
> conditions. Two of them were intubated for about a month and still cannot
> tell you the name of the building they are in. They will stage extended
> recoveries but unclear if they will regain previous functional levels. One
> of them had several strokes and will be permanently severely disabled. My
> colleague in house this weekend rounded on 9. We have about 80 total in
> hospital, 60 confirmed, 20 suspected.
>
> There are plenty of papers out there for anyone interested in masks. This
> list is a good start:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/u/0/d/1m-o_9N9Yq3cq7toP1-nZKtAHTIQ-Nqeqaj866sycl6w/mobilebasic
>
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2020, 5:41 PM Max Dillon via Mercedes <
> mercedes@okiebenz.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to