LOL!
wow, Sunil, if you think there's been a "feces-storm" here, you've lived a
blessedly sheltered life! all i've seen is a sharing of opinions!
you might want to consider not going to work with the general public! ;-)
cheers!
e
Sunil Hari wrote:
> yeah, i guess "it's her fault she got taken for a ride" isn't a valid excuse
> with a wife. but clay pitched it on here (btw, thanks clay) and this is the
> ensuing feces-storm.
>
> get the umbrella out.
>
> On 10/11/06, Luther Gulseth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Ok all, look at it this way. If it's a seller that you do not know, it's
> > ok to go in and pay or offer less than the value as you know it. BUT, in
> > this situation, Clay has a vested interest (wife's friendship) in the
> > situation and it's OBVIOUS that his wife would require him to give his
> > knowledge of the value of the car. If he didn't and allowed someone to low
> > ball her friend and take advantage of her, Clay would surely find himself in
> > the doghouse if he was discovered.
> >
> >
> > --
