lothiraldan added a comment.
Here are some measures https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/rHG0865d25e8a8ad664e8da31ab1bf12f1fc9bf0c7a: $ python -m perf command /home/lothiraldan/project/mercurial/mercurial/hg id -r . ..................... command: Mean +- std dev: 109 ms +- 3 ms $ python -m perf command /home/lothiraldan/project/mercurial/mercurial/hg id -r . ..................... command: Mean +- std dev: 110 ms +- 2 ms $ python -m perf command /home/lothiraldan/project/mercurial/mercurial/hg id -r . ..................... command: Mean +- std dev: 111 ms +- 3 ms And here are the mesaures on https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/rHGc36c3fa7d35b0aa1c29d316927b21f77ecc809b8: $ python -m perf command /home/lothiraldan/project/mercurial/mercurial/hg id -r . ..................... command: Mean +- std dev: 166 ms +- 5 ms $ python -m perf command /home/lothiraldan/project/mercurial/mercurial/hg id -r . ..................... command: Mean +- std dev: 165 ms +- 3 ms $ python -m perf command /home/lothiraldan/project/mercurial/mercurial/hg id -r . ..................... command: Mean +- std dev: 166 ms +- 5 ms So it's seems that this patch solves most of the performance regression, but with so many changesets since https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/rHGc36c3fa7d35b0aa1c29d316927b21f77ecc809b8 I'm not sure we can do better. REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial REVISION DETAIL https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1253 To: durham, #hg-reviewers, lothiraldan Cc: yuja, lothiraldan, mharbison72, mercurial-devel _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
