On Feb 28, 11:33 am, Bastian Doetsch <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > as I'm not quite content with how Trac manages our tickets and > Assembla support for Trac is rather limited, I would like to discuss > if we should re-import our trac tickets into Assembla's ticket tool > and use it.
Is that automated? > Currently, all ticket reports are broken in Trac, probably > due to some problem with ticket #132, and I don't know when Assembla > staff will be able to fix this issue. That's quite annoying. > Moreover, afaik you can't make > trac guarantee that someone who edits a ticket leaves an email > address, which is quite unfortunate if you have questions about a bug > report...Assembla have added custom permissions to their ticket tool, > so now it is possible to allow non-project-members to edit tickets, > which was the reason for moving to trac :). A disadvantage would of > course be, that tickets and wiki would not be as integrated as now, as > long as we use the Trac wiki. > > Personally, I'd prefer moving to bitbucket completely, but converting > the wiki would probably be too much of a hassle. bitbucket is nice, but as far as I understand the ticket tracker is the weakest part of the system, right? I wonder why they don't use an existing one instead of reimplementing it from scratch. Best, Ismael --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MercurialEclipse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mercurialeclipse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
