---Aaron Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >     How about another option Aaron? You touch anyone's
> > exponents...especially mine and I report you to the FBI for
stealing?
> > DAMNIT....I sure as hell hope the above message was in jest.  You
> > better not play around with my exponents (or anyone else's for that
> > matter) or I'll raise hell on this list.
> 
> Wow!  Well, I wasn't kidding, I did grab some exponents and am
testing them.
> I guess you'll have to call the FBI?
> 
> Obviously, opinions on this matter are VERY extreme!
> 
> As for you Ashton, which of those numbers in my message belonged to
you?
> Are you still testing it and, if so, why no updates in over a year?
> 
> Let me know and I'll leave you at it, but for goodness sake, if you
have a
> machine that slow, please consider factoring or double-checking
smaller
> exponents.  It's just as important to do those tests and a slower
machine is
> much better suited.  I don't use a hammer to cut wood, I don't use a
> screwdriver to paint my walls, and I don't use a pocket calculator
to do FFT
> work, but for adding 2+2, it's just fine.  Get the drift?  Certain
tools are
> better suited to certain jobs.  Find the job that your slower
computer is
> best suited for and go for it.
> 
> Am I just wrong in thinking this?

    First of all, no, none of those exponents are mine. I have tons of
machines running Prime95 and I'm pretty high up on the list of
producers It's just that I think you're way off base on this...and I'm
sure other people on this list think the same too.  <whine, complain,
etc.> George, (or someone else!) could you please explain to Aaron why
he is off base of this one.....something along the lines of "Ashton
has the right to set his machine to do whatever kind of work he wants
it to do. It's a fun project. Don't go around annoying people, etc.,
etc. blah, blah."

    It's just not fair to take exponents that other people are working
on (in the hopes of being the co-discoverer of M39) and have them find
a "Exponent already tested" when their machine checks in two
months....especially after some of the exponents you listed seemed to
be more that 50% complete.  Is it just me or are you just not thinking
straight this past week? (Compared with your regular postings, they
seem to be far more illogical!)

Thanks!

Ashton
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm

Reply via email to