On 8 August 2017 at 16:10, Eric Engestrom <eric.engest...@imgtec.com> wrote: > On Saturday, 2017-08-05 00:25:49 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: >> From: Emil Velikov <emil.veli...@collabora.com> >> >> As mentioned in previous commit the negative tests in dEQP expect the >> arguments to be evaluated in particular order. > > The spec doesn't say that, so the test is wrong. > Changing it in Mesa doesn't hurt though, so I have nothing against it, > except for the fact it hide the dEQP bug. > I agree, the spec does not say anything on the topic. I think it makes sense to have the patch regardless, since it provides a bit more consistency.
Although fixing dEQP is also a good idea. I think Tapani/Chad have some experience/pointers on the topic. -Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev