On 8 August 2017 at 16:10, Eric Engestrom <eric.engest...@imgtec.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, 2017-08-05 00:25:49 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> From: Emil Velikov <emil.veli...@collabora.com>
>> As mentioned in previous commit the negative tests in dEQP expect the
>> arguments to be evaluated in particular order.
> The spec doesn't say that, so the test is wrong.
> Changing it in Mesa doesn't hurt though, so I have nothing against it,
> except for the fact it hide the dEQP bug.
I agree, the spec does not say anything on the topic.
I think it makes sense to have the patch regardless, since it provides
a bit more consistency.
Although fixing dEQP is also a good idea. I think Tapani/Chad have
some experience/pointers on the topic.
mesa-dev mailing list