On 26 September 2017 at 18:08, Juan A. Suarez Romero
<jasua...@igalia.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 15:07 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 5 August 2017 at 00:25, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > From: Emil Velikov <emil.veli...@collabora.com>
>> >
>> > As mentioned in previous commit the negative tests in dEQP expect the
>> > arguments to be evaluated in particular order.
>> >
>> > Namely - first the dpy, then the config, followed by the surface/window.
>> >
>> > Move the check further down or executing the test below will produce
>> > the following error.
>> >
>> > dEQP-EGL.functional.negative_api.create_pbuffer_surface
>> >
>> >
>> > <Section Name="Test2" Description="EGL_BAD_CONFIG is generated if
>> > config is not an EGL frame buffer configuration">
>> > <Text>eglCreateWindowSurface(0x9bfff0f150, 0xffffffffffffffff,
>> > 0x0000000000000000, { EGL_NONE });</Text>
>> > <Text>// 0x0000000000000000 returned</Text>
>> > <Text>// ERROR expected: EGL_BAD_CONFIG, Got:
>> > EGL_BAD_NATIVE_WINDOW</Text>
>> > </Section>
>> >
>>
>> FTR dEQP has been "fixed" (by removing the test all together) to not
>> generate the above error. At the same the Pixman equivalent is still
>> buggy, hence the v2 of commit
>> df8efd5b74d45e2bfb977a92dcd3db86abd6b143.
>>
>
> Emil, does it mean this patch is superseded? I'm interesting in knowing
> the situation as this was tagged to be included in stable release.
>
I'd like to keep this open and eventually merge it.
The dEQP patches need 'a bit' of polishing.
-Emil
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
