On Wed, 2017-09-27 at 16:15 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 26 September 2017 at 18:08, Juan A. Suarez Romero
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 15:07 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > > On 5 August 2017 at 00:25, Emil Velikov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > From: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
> > > >
> > > > As mentioned in previous commit the negative tests in dEQP expect the
> > > > arguments to be evaluated in particular order.
> > > >
> > > > Namely - first the dpy, then the config, followed by the surface/window.
> > > >
> > > > Move the check further down or executing the test below will produce
> > > > the following error.
> > > >
> > > > dEQP-EGL.functional.negative_api.create_pbuffer_surface
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > <Section Name="Test2" Description="EGL_BAD_CONFIG is generated if
> > > > config is not an EGL frame buffer configuration">
> > > > <Text>eglCreateWindowSurface(0x9bfff0f150, 0xffffffffffffffff,
> > > > 0x0000000000000000, { EGL_NONE });</Text>
> > > > <Text>// 0x0000000000000000 returned</Text>
> > > > <Text>// ERROR expected: EGL_BAD_CONFIG, Got:
> > > > EGL_BAD_NATIVE_WINDOW</Text>
> > > > </Section>
> > > >
> > >
> > > FTR dEQP has been "fixed" (by removing the test all together) to not
> > > generate the above error. At the same the Pixman equivalent is still
> > > buggy, hence the v2 of commit
> > > df8efd5b74d45e2bfb977a92dcd3db86abd6b143.
> > >
> >
> > Emil, does it mean this patch is superseded? I'm interesting in knowing
> > the situation as this was tagged to be included in stable release.
> >
>
> I'd like to keep this open and eventually merge it.
> The dEQP patches need 'a bit' of polishing.
>
Sure. I'll skip it for next release. Thanks
J.A.
> -Emil
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-stable mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-stable
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
