On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 11:12:26AM -0700, Nanley Chery wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 03:36:54PM +0300, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
> > On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 12:03:55PM -0700, Nanley Chery wrote:
> > > We're going to delete intel_miptree_alloc_ccs() in the next commit. With
> > > that in mind, replace the use of this function in
> > > do_single_blorp_clear() with intel_miptree_alloc_aux() and move the
> > > delayed allocation logic to it's callers.
> > > ---
> > >  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp.c         |  2 +-
> > >  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c | 19 ++++++-------------
> > >  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.h |  2 +-
> > >  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp.c 
> > > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp.c
> > > index ba14136edc6..e6eedf3cedc 100644
> > > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp.c
> > > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp.c
> > > @@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ do_single_blorp_clear(struct brw_context *brw, 
> > > struct gl_framebuffer *fb,
> > >      */
> > >     if (can_fast_clear && !irb->mt->aux_buf) {
> > >        assert(irb->mt->aux_usage == ISL_AUX_USAGE_CCS_D);
> > > -      if (!intel_miptree_alloc_ccs(brw, irb->mt)) {
> > > +      if (!intel_miptree_alloc_aux(brw, irb->mt)) {
> > >           /* There are a few reasons in addition to out-of-memory, that 
> > > can
> > >            * cause intel_miptree_alloc_non_msrt_mcs to fail.  Try to 
> > > recover by
> > >            * falling back to non-fast clear.
> > > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c 
> > > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
> > > index 1de381141ea..84be7c07c6f 100644
> > > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
> > > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
> > > @@ -59,10 +59,6 @@ static void *intel_miptree_map_raw(struct brw_context 
> > > *brw,
> > >  
> > >  static void intel_miptree_unmap_raw(struct intel_mipmap_tree *mt);
> > >  
> > > -static bool
> > > -intel_miptree_alloc_aux(struct brw_context *brw,
> > > -                        struct intel_mipmap_tree *mt);
> > > -
> > >  static bool
> > >  intel_miptree_supports_mcs(struct brw_context *brw,
> > >                             const struct intel_mipmap_tree *mt)
> > > @@ -791,7 +787,8 @@ intel_miptree_create(struct brw_context *brw,
> > >  
> > >     mt->offset = 0;
> > >  
> > > -   if (!intel_miptree_alloc_aux(brw, mt)) {
> > > +   if (mt->aux_usage != ISL_AUX_USAGE_CCS_D &&
> > > +       !intel_miptree_alloc_aux(brw, mt)) {
> > >        intel_miptree_release(&mt);
> > >        return NULL;
> > >     }
> > > @@ -882,7 +879,8 @@ intel_miptree_create_for_bo(struct brw_context *brw,
> > >     if (!(flags & MIPTREE_CREATE_NO_AUX)) {
> > >        intel_miptree_choose_aux_usage(brw, mt);
> > >  
> > > -      if (!intel_miptree_alloc_aux(brw, mt)) {
> > > +      if (mt->aux_usage != ISL_AUX_USAGE_CCS_D &&
> > > +          !intel_miptree_alloc_aux(brw, mt)) {
> > >           intel_miptree_release(&mt);
> > >           return NULL;
> > >        }
> > > @@ -1781,7 +1779,7 @@ intel_miptree_alloc_mcs(struct brw_context *brw,
> > >     return true;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -bool
> > > +static bool
> > >  intel_miptree_alloc_ccs(struct brw_context *brw,
> > >                          struct intel_mipmap_tree *mt)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -1902,7 +1900,7 @@ intel_miptree_alloc_hiz(struct brw_context *brw,
> > >   * create the auxiliary surfaces up-front.  CCS_D, on the other hand, 
> > > can only
> > >   * compress clear color so we wait until an actual fast-clear to 
> > > allocate it.
> > 
> > I started wondering if we should duplicate this piece of comment in the
> > callers as they now make that decision?
> > 
> 
> That's a good idea.
> 
>    /* Create the auxiliary surface up-front. CCS_D, on the other hand,
>     * can only compress clear color so we wait until an actual
>     * fast-clear to allocate it.
>     */
> 

I've added the comment to the two callers in intel_mipmap_tree.c and
appended the commit message with:

    v2: Duplicate the delayed allocation comment (Topi Pohjolainen).

Please let me know if you'd like me to send the v2 to the list.

-Nanley

> -Nanley
> 
> > >   */
> > > -static bool
> > > +bool
> > >  intel_miptree_alloc_aux(struct brw_context *brw,
> > >                          struct intel_mipmap_tree *mt)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -1924,11 +1922,6 @@ intel_miptree_alloc_aux(struct brw_context *brw,
> > >        return true;
> > >  
> > >     case ISL_AUX_USAGE_CCS_D:
> > > -      /* Since CCS_D can only compress clear color so we wait until an 
> > > actual
> > > -       * fast-clear to allocate it.
> > > -       */
> > > -      return true;
> > > -
> > >     case ISL_AUX_USAGE_CCS_E:
> > >        assert(_mesa_is_format_color_format(mt->format));
> > >        assert(mt->surf.samples == 1);
> > > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.h 
> > > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.h
> > > index 8cea562dfa4..9a5d97bf348 100644
> > > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.h
> > > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.h
> > > @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ struct intel_mipmap_tree
> > >  };
> > >  
> > >  bool
> > > -intel_miptree_alloc_ccs(struct brw_context *brw,
> > > +intel_miptree_alloc_aux(struct brw_context *brw,
> > >                          struct intel_mipmap_tree *mt);
> > >  
> > >  enum intel_miptree_create_flags {
> > > -- 
> > > 2.16.2
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > mesa-dev mailing list
> > > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to