In that case, it should use the ARB_gpu_shader5 enable bit. Marek
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> wrote: > On Monday, June 01, 2015 11:35:03 AM Dave Airlie wrote: >> From: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com> >> >> I'm not sure if we shouldn't enable this everywhere >> and rip out the API checks, >> >> discuss, >> >> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com> >> --- >> src/mesa/state_tracker/st_extensions.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_extensions.c >> b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_extensions.c >> index b1057f3..3b828fa 100644 >> --- a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_extensions.c >> +++ b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_extensions.c >> @@ -598,6 +598,7 @@ void st_init_extensions(struct pipe_screen *screen, >> extensions->ARB_half_float_vertex = GL_TRUE; >> extensions->ARB_internalformat_query = GL_TRUE; >> extensions->ARB_map_buffer_range = GL_TRUE; >> + extensions->ARB_shader_subroutine = GL_TRUE; >> extensions->ARB_texture_border_clamp = GL_TRUE; /* XXX temp */ >> extensions->ARB_texture_cube_map = GL_TRUE; >> extensions->ARB_texture_env_combine = GL_TRUE; >> > > I know people have talked about enabling it everywhere 1.30+ is > available. That makes some sense. > > Here's an argument for keeping it optional: We don't want people using > this extension, so there's no value - in fact, negative value - to > exposing it unless we have to. Drivers that can't do 4.0, such as > Sandybridge, could avoid advertising it if we kept it optional. > > I'm happy to defer to majority opinion. > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev > _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
