Thomas Tanner wrote:
> Another important question: Is the upcoming beta 3 supposed to
> have autoconf support?
Yes.
> If so, do you still want to split Mesa
> into the library and demos
Yes.
> and how (configure.in doesn't support it yet)?
>
> I suggest to move all demos to a subdirectory "demos":
>
> demos -> demos/demos
> 3Dfx/demos -> demos/3Dfx
> BeOS -> demos/BeOS
> book -> demos/book
> ggi/demos -> demos/ggi
> images -> demos/images
> mtdemos -> demos/mthread
> samples -> demos/samples
> utils -> demos/utils
> xdemos -> demos/x11
>
> That would be the only way to support
> the two separate packages with autoconf.
Really?! It shouldn't be hard to detect the presence of those
subdirs and conditionally build their contents. But then again,
I don't know much about autoconf.
> In any case, I think it'd be a much cleaner directory structure
> (less stuff in the toplevel directory)
You've got a point there.
> Brian, do you think that's reasonable?
> Could you move those directories on the CVS server?
I'm hesitant to do that right now with beta 3 impending.
Let's wait and see.
-Brian
_______________________________________________
Mesa-dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.mesa3d.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
