Dave Airlie wrote:
In the case of X.org, OTOH, you are *only* talking about the software
rasterizer for Indirect GLX. I don't think it's unreasonable to say
that the policy could change to make that track the Mesa stable branch
or even just to track Mesa releases.
Actually with all this talk of new extensions we need it now more than
ever.. we couldn't develop EXT_tfp or EXT_include_inferiors in only one
tree... we need to co-develop the client and server sides.. hence the
GLX protocol for client and server sides need to be defined in the
glproto module...
Ah well, it seemed like too easy of an escape...
Keith
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Mesa3d-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
