On Dec 18, 2007 11:10 PM, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 22:40 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote: > > There are quite a few branches in the mesa repo that haven't seen a > > commit in many years. > > > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/refs/heads > > > > I may be missing something, but it seems like it would be nice to > > clean up some branches that have no chance of being committed to > > again. Some that come to mind: autoconf, experimental-1, mesa (I'm not > > really sure at all what this was for) and any of the mesa_x_y_branch > > branches prior to probably 6. To delete branches from the remote repo, > > just do > > > > git push origin :branchtodelete > > > > where having the empty refspec on the left side of the colon means > > that an empty revision is being pushed to that branch. > > > > What do you guys think? > > I'm not sure what we'd gain in exchange for losing history. At the very > least, I think such branches should be preserved in a separate > legacy/history repository.
I guess I wasn't considering the historical side of things. What I was considering is that if you clone mesa, you get a ton of branches, and it's difficult to know what's relevant now. -- Dan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
