http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6355
--- Comment #30 from George - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-04-24 07:01:45 PST --- (In reply to comment #26) > > Right, I think it would be best if glcore was a new --with-driver option. And > you get different linking options depending on which driver you specified. Is > that right? It seems like the libraries glcore links to would always be the > same since it doesn't depend on DRI. > > For the non-autoconf case, you first have to run `make linux-dri' to get the > configs symlink setup. It doesn't work out of the box. I think it would be > best > to make new linux-glcore, freebsd-glcore, etc., configs files. > > If you agree with that plan, I can help write some patches. > I don't pretty much get what you are suggesting but the point of the patches is that glcore is not to be build stand-alone but as a "companion" to either dri or xlib. You *first* build dri or xlib with whatever built system you like and *then* type: # make glcore # make glcore-install glcore will be built properly in all cases. Otherwise, you'd have to keep a separate tree for glcore ... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
