Michał Król wrote: > Brian Paul pisze: >> I think I'd prefer to rename the "simple" LOOP2/ENDLOOP2 instructions >> as LOOP/ENDLOOP and call the above functions LOOP_COUNT/ENDLOOP_COUNT. >> >> > > I am all for renaming, but just to make them shorter, what about the > following renaming? > > LOOP => FORLOOP > ENDLOOP => ENDFOR > > BGNLOOP2 => BGNLOOP > ENDLOOP2 => ENDLOOP >
How about LOOP => BGNFOR to be symmetric with ENDFOR? -Brian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
