Brian Paul pisze: > Michał Król wrote: > >> Brian Paul pisze: >> >>> I think I'd prefer to rename the "simple" LOOP2/ENDLOOP2 instructions >>> as LOOP/ENDLOOP and call the above functions LOOP_COUNT/ENDLOOP_COUNT. >>> >>> >>> >> I am all for renaming, but just to make them shorter, what about the >> following renaming? >> >> LOOP => FORLOOP >> ENDLOOP => ENDFOR >> >> BGNLOOP2 => BGNLOOP >> ENDLOOP2 => ENDLOOP >> >> > > How about LOOP => BGNFOR to be symmetric with ENDFOR? > > Yes, certainly. I am pushing a change for the master branch.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
