On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Brian Paul <bri...@vmware.com> wrote:
> Brian Paul wrote:
>> Ian Romanick wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Brian Paul wrote:
>>>> Ian Romanick wrote:
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>
>>>>> Final versions of both Mesa 7.8 and 7.7.1 have been released.  Links on
>>>>> the Mesa website will still need to be updated, but I think Brian has to
>>>>> do that.
>>>> I'll do that soon.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The tag in the GIT repository for Mesa 7.8 is 'mesa-7.8'.  I had
>>>>> originally intended to just use 7.8, but having a tag and a branch with
>>>>> the same name makes GIT angry (i.e., you get "warning: refname '7.8' is
>>>>> ambiguous.").
>>>> Yeah, that's what I'm getting now - and I can't seem to update my 7.8
>>>> branch to the latest commit:
>>>>
>>>> $ git rebase origin/7.8
>>>> warning: refname '7.8' is ambiguous.
>>>> Current branch 7.8 is up to date.
>>>>
>>>> I'm stuck at commit 59258498dc6fa51573b176d071644bd3e750b5ac now.  Help?
>>> Hmm... I did 'git tag -d 7.8' and that fixed the problem locally.  I
>>> thought pushing tags afterwards would delete the remote tag, but
>>> apparently not.  I'll try to solve that today.
>>
>> OK, "git tag -d 7.8" fixed the problem here.
>
> Grrr, the 7.8 tag comes back after a git-fetch though.

You might just have to go on annarchy and do "git --git-dir=$the_repo
tag -d 7.8". You might also be able to push an empty source to the
remote with "git push origin :refs/tags/7.8".

--
Dan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Mesa3d-dev mailing list
Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev

Reply via email to