On Apr 1, 2010, at 15:27, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Jeremy Huddleston > <jerem...@freedesktop.org> wrote: >> >> On Apr 1, 2010, at 14:18, Dan Nicholson wrote: >> >>>> +$(PROGS): $(PROGS:%=%.o) >>> >>> Is this necessary? I would think the prereq would be picked up >>> implicitly like the .c from the .o. >> >> Nope. Without this, it tries to compile the .c directly to the executable >> rather than the .o first. > > Even after you remove the .SUFFIXES lines?
Yep. > Yeah, I guess it would have > that assumption since the names are the same. I know it's ugly. I tried finding another way, but that's what ended up working =/ > automake/libtool certainly passes both CFLAGS and LDFLAGS during the > linking step. All the other targets in this same Makefile do, too. For > better or worse, I think we need to pass the CFLAGS during the link. ok. I'll send an updated version in a bit for review. Thanks, Jeremy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
