On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Matei Zaharia <[email protected]>wrote:
> Why don't we start with 0.5 or even 1.0, given that we already had > numbered alpha releases and the project has been around for a while? > Don't fear the double 0, Robert Parrish was was solid and he never needed to bump! > > Matei > > On Feb 16, 2012, at 6:40 PM, Andy Konwinski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I chatted with Ben about this, and we propose that we use 0.0.1 for the > > version number for our first apache release, and we adopt versioning > rules > > like these http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html (i.e. the version > scheme > > is major.minor.patch). > > > > Does anybody have thoughts or objections? > > > > I've added a new "version" in JIRA called "0.0.1" that (pending this > > discussion) we can start using to keep track of which Issues are intended > > to go into the first release (see > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS/fixforversion/12319875which is > > currently pretty boring because I've only assigned one issue to it, as a > > test) > > > > Note: we used version numbers before entering the incubator to identify > our > > github tagged alpha "releases", the most recent one being alpha 0.4 (see > > https://github.com/mesos/mesos/tags) > > > > Andy > -- John Sirois 303-512-3301
