Sorry for the delayed response. If by users, you mean framework writers, then the API might change for them, especially on the executor side.
-- Vinod On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Matei Zaharia <[email protected]>wrote: > Vinod, why not save slave restarting for 1.1? It's not going to change the > APIs the user sees, right? > > Matei > > On Feb 17, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Andy Konwinski wrote: > > > Ok. Unless anybody has more thoughts I'll create a [VOTE] thread for > using > > 0.9 for the release. > > > > From my phone. > > On Feb 17, 2012 1:24 PM, "Haoyuan Li" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> No strong opinion either. But if I was an user, I probably would not > >> consider it seriously if I saw the version number is 0.0.1... > >> > >> Best, > >> > >> Haoyuan > >> > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Ali Ghodsi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> I have no strong opinion, but 0.0.1 sounds like a really early > >>> prototype. The project has been active for several years and it's used > >>> in production, so 0.5 or 0.1 would make sense. > >>> > >>> --Ali > >>> > >>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Matei Zaharia < > [email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> Why don't we start with 0.5 or even 1.0, given that we already had > >>> numbered alpha releases and the project has been around for a while? > >>>> > >>>> Matei > >>>> > >>>> On Feb 16, 2012, at 6:40 PM, Andy Konwinski <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I chatted with Ben about this, and we propose that we use 0.0.1 for > >> the > >>>>> version number for our first apache release, and we adopt versioning > >>> rules > >>>>> like these http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html (i.e. the version > >>> scheme > >>>>> is major.minor.patch). > >>>>> > >>>>> Does anybody have thoughts or objections? > >>>>> > >>>>> I've added a new "version" in JIRA called "0.0.1" that (pending this > >>>>> discussion) we can start using to keep track of which Issues are > >>> intended > >>>>> to go into the first release (see > >>>>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS/fixforversion/12319875whichis > >>>>> currently pretty boring because I've only assigned one issue to it, > >> as a > >>>>> test) > >>>>> > >>>>> Note: we used version numbers before entering the incubator to > >> identify > >>> our > >>>>> github tagged alpha "releases", the most recent one being alpha 0.4 > >> (see > >>>>> https://github.com/mesos/mesos/tags) > >>>>> > >>>>> Andy > >>> > >> > >
