No strong opinion either. But if I was an user, I probably would not consider it seriously if I saw the version number is 0.0.1...
Best, Haoyuan On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Ali Ghodsi <[email protected]> wrote: > I have no strong opinion, but 0.0.1 sounds like a really early > prototype. The project has been active for several years and it's used > in production, so 0.5 or 0.1 would make sense. > > --Ali > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Matei Zaharia <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Why don't we start with 0.5 or even 1.0, given that we already had > numbered alpha releases and the project has been around for a while? > > > > Matei > > > > On Feb 16, 2012, at 6:40 PM, Andy Konwinski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I chatted with Ben about this, and we propose that we use 0.0.1 for the > >> version number for our first apache release, and we adopt versioning > rules > >> like these http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html (i.e. the version > scheme > >> is major.minor.patch). > >> > >> Does anybody have thoughts or objections? > >> > >> I've added a new "version" in JIRA called "0.0.1" that (pending this > >> discussion) we can start using to keep track of which Issues are > intended > >> to go into the first release (see > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS/fixforversion/12319875which is > >> currently pretty boring because I've only assigned one issue to it, as a > >> test) > >> > >> Note: we used version numbers before entering the incubator to identify > our > >> github tagged alpha "releases", the most recent one being alpha 0.4 (see > >> https://github.com/mesos/mesos/tags) > >> > >> Andy >
