----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7289/#review11936 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/detector/detector.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/7289/#comment25471> I think this comment is more readable in numbered form: // Three scenarios are possible here: // 1. We were the master and we're still the master (because we haven't yet gotten a session expiration). // 2. Someone else was the master and they're still the master. // 3. Someone else was the master and someone else still is now the master. // Either way, run the leader detector. Run the leader detector to pick up the new leader regardless..? - Ben Mahler On Sept. 26, 2012, 6:01 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/7289/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 26, 2012, 6:01 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, John Sirois, Vinod Kone, and Ben Mahler. > > > Description > ------- > > See summary (1 of 7). > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/detector/detector.cpp 0246846 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7289/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Benjamin Hindman > >
