-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7454/#review12238
-----------------------------------------------------------



third_party/libprocess/include/stout/net.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/7454/#comment25974>

    I guess I should have been more clear:
    
    s/return code/HTTP Response Code



third_party/libprocess/include/stout/net.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/7454/#comment25972>

    Ok now we can just return fd directly since it's a Try<int> with the 
appropriate error, right?
    
    This convention works if we've augmented all of our os Try::error strings 
in os, but I could be convinced otherwise :)



third_party/libprocess/include/stout/net.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/7454/#comment25973>

    Feel free to punt, but eventually we'd likely want fdopen, fclose wrappers 
in stout/fs.hpp.


- Ben Mahler


On Oct. 8, 2012, 7:27 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/7454/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 8, 2012, 7:27 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Better error messages
> 
> 
> Fix for curl download
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/launcher/launcher.cpp 5de1f479cf03182a1c12bdd951b5bd57c00ee2ee 
>   third_party/libprocess/include/stout/net.hpp 
> f6b770c8ca7d21e0aca0f614168a0985c77046b0 
>   third_party/libprocess/include/stout/os.hpp 
> 13dbc715ed08cfe6b24ee20744d427dac1104694 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7454/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested locally
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vinod Kone
> 
>

Reply via email to