> On Jan. 28, 2013, 8:44 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > third_party/libprocess/include/process/statistics.hpp, line 26
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/9093/diff/2/?file=251833#file251833line26>
> >
> >     s/sparsifying/aggregating/ ?

What I mean here is instead of always deleting the oldest value, we would 
sparsify older values.

E.g.
Within 1 minute ago: Keep all values
Within 1-2 minutes ago: Keep half the values
Within 2-4 minutes ago: Keep 1/4 the values
Within 4-8 minutes ago: Keep 1/8 the values
etc..

There are many techniques for sparsifying the older values, I'm not sure which 
would be best as of yet.


> On Jan. 28, 2013, 8:44 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > third_party/libprocess/include/process/statistics.hpp, line 27
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/9093/diff/2/?file=251833#file251833line27>
> >
> >     s/oldest/older/

Indeed I mean oldest.


- Ben


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9093/#review15767
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 24, 2013, 11:19 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9093/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 24, 2013, 11:19 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Some statistics will be ephemeral. (e.g. executor resource usage information).
> It does not make sense to keep a value of these stats in the snapshot.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug MESOS-324.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-324
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   third_party/libprocess/include/process/statistics.hpp 
> 9e3041a6e2a8ef022eacacad00bc4d974a8e33c9 
>   third_party/libprocess/src/statistics.cpp 
> 2fe8af83c6c63a0fa8cb2e9636f9289f0e3d7f2f 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9093/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ben Mahler
> 
>

Reply via email to