> On Feb. 5, 2013, 7:36 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> > src/tests/stout_tests.cpp, line 10
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/9304/diff/1/?file=255488#file255488line10>
> >
> >     It's a bit unfortunate that error.hpp and none.hpp have to be included 
> > to be used, despite being tied so closely with try.hpp, result.hpp, and 
> > option.hpp.

Let's consider adding some aggregating headers like "functional.hpp" which 
includes all that's necessary.


> On Feb. 5, 2013, 7:36 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> > third_party/libprocess/include/stout/error.hpp, line 31
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/9304/diff/1/?file=255490#file255490line31>
> >
> >     Can you give an example here?
> >     Are the nested cases in your stout_tests?
> >     
> >     Ditto for none.hpp

Added an example in the comment.


> On Feb. 5, 2013, 7:36 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> > third_party/libprocess/include/stout/error.hpp, line 23
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/9304/diff/1/?file=255490#file255490line23>
> >
> >     explicit?

Great idea!


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9304/#review16132
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 8, 2013, 5:48 a.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9304/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 8, 2013, 5:48 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Vinod Kone and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/stout_tests.cpp fffef3e42774e9b090a098a219a92e642d303d27 
>   third_party/libprocess/Makefile.am dad1b65c3fdb7dbdad4e7c3d9c241cc4e89c3325 
>   third_party/libprocess/include/stout/error.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   third_party/libprocess/include/stout/none.hpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9304/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Hindman
> 
>

Reply via email to