> On March 29, 2013, 7:39 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > src/detector/detector.cpp, lines 250-252
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/10161/diff/1/?file=275661#file275661line250>
> >
> >     isn't this redundant?

Redundant but explicit. I'll drop them since I'm not sure what our convention 
is.


- Ben


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10161/#review18529
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 28, 2013, 6:25 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10161/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 28, 2013, 6:25 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is also along the way to fixing MESOS-305.
> 
> This fixes a bug where we were not clearing the sequence number when sending 
> a NoMasterDetectedMessage.
> As a result, this removes the need for hiding NoMasterDetectedMessages from 
> contending non-leaders.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/detector/detector.cpp 7a8355162d543e017505dd58efd2d7bf96f99623 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10161/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> I'd like to add a test for this, but I don't see how to induce a timedout() 
> call on the ZooKeeperMasterDetectorProcess, unless I add some plumbing to get 
> a handle to the underlying process. Suggestions?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ben Mahler
> 
>

Reply via email to