-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11206/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for mesos and Benjamin Hindman.


Description
-------

Previously when we were doing hierarchical allocation by user, we created and 
removed user pools for allocation based on what users had frameworks currently 
running in the cluster. However, with the role abstraction it makes sense to 
have more persistence than that, especially once we add weights - if you set 
the weight for a role, you want the allocator to remember it even if there 
aren't any frameworks for that role currently running.

So, I decided that it made sense to create a concept of specific roles that are 
allowable in the cluster. With this patch, its only possible to pass roles in 
to the master as a command line flag (to ease what I assume will be the common 
case - clusters with relatively static sets of roles), but a future wdrf patch 
will add http endpoints to add, remove, and update roles.

This patch also enforces that frameworks register with valid role (this won't 
affect people who don't care about roles, since there's always the "*" role, 
which is the default for frameworks that don't specify a role).


Diffs
-----

  include/mesos/mesos.proto 1c242d6 
  src/master/allocator.hpp b68b67d 
  src/master/flags.hpp 8481baa 
  src/master/hierarchical_allocator_process.hpp 2422fbd 
  src/master/master.hpp d3790dc 
  src/master/master.cpp 3207157 
  src/tests/allocator_tests.cpp 540c05a 
  src/tests/allocator_zookeeper_tests.cpp 2c7deb1 
  src/tests/resource_offers_tests.cpp 5e53a89 
  src/tests/utils.hpp ca3ecd7 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11206/diff/


Testing
-------

make check


Thanks,

Thomas Marshall

Reply via email to