-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11206/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated June 13, 2013, 7:24 p.m.)


Review request for mesos and Benjamin Hindman.


Summary (updated)
-----------------

WDRF 2 - Add concept of valid roles


Description
-------

Previously when we were doing hierarchical allocation by user, we created and 
removed user pools for allocation based on what users had frameworks currently 
running in the cluster. However, with the role abstraction it makes sense to 
have more persistence than that, especially once we add weights - if you set 
the weight for a role, you want the allocator to remember it even if there 
aren't any frameworks for that role currently running.

So, I decided that it made sense to create a concept of specific roles that are 
allowable in the cluster. With this patch, its only possible to pass roles in 
to the master as a command line flag (to ease what I assume will be the common 
case - clusters with relatively static sets of roles), but a future wdrf patch 
will add http endpoints to add, remove, and update roles.

This patch also enforces that frameworks register with valid role (this won't 
affect people who don't care about roles, since there's always the "*" role, 
which is the default for frameworks that don't specify a role).


This addresses bug MESOS-504.
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-504


Diffs
-----

  src/master/allocator.hpp 78c75bb 
  src/master/flags.hpp f4ce8c1 
  src/master/hierarchical_allocator_process.hpp 1048a28 
  src/master/master.hpp 86c5232 
  src/master/master.cpp 60c6d4f 
  src/messages/messages.proto 2c196ee 
  src/tests/allocator_tests.cpp 32f0a90 
  src/tests/allocator_zookeeper_tests.cpp 1daaecd 
  src/tests/mesos.hpp fca41aa 
  src/tests/resource_offers_tests.cpp 3d5f02d 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11206/diff/


Testing
-------

make check


Thanks,

Thomas Marshall

Reply via email to