2014-07-02 21:18, Denys Dmytriyenko skrev:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 09:13:16PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
2014-07-02 20:13, Denys Dmytriyenko skrev:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 08:05:09PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 07:21:24AM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
When I build an image with QT5 using meta-arago, qtbase fails with a
lot of error messages.
This is the wrong mailing list - meta-ti has nothing to do with qtbase.
Moreover, why are you still using 5.1.1? There were many fixes in Qt5 5.2.x
and 5.3.x. Also, it depends on your setup and what layers and features you
configure. Either way, it's a discussion for a distro layer, you can use
meta-arago mailing list for that...
I looked through meta-arago and meta-qt5 about a month ago for compatability.
I checked again today:
meta-qt5/master = 5.3.0
meta-qt5/daisy = 5.2.1
meta-qt5/dora = 5.1.1
meta-arago/master = 5.2.0
meta-arago/dora = 5.2.0 (used to be 5.1.1)
There is no meta-arago/daisy branch.
The only revision I could find which was available in both was 5.1.1.
and that is why I used it.
It would make sense if the qt5 related recipes in meta-arago matched those in
meta-qt5.
Now meta-arago is using 5.2.0 which is not present in any branch of meta-qt5
(did not check old branches, only dora and daisy).
I dont understand why the meta-arago:dora recipes for qt5 has been updated from
5.1.1 to 5.2.0,
thus making it incompatible with meta-qt5:dora. Isn't this a mistake.
meta-qt5 for long time only had master, moreover, due to some requirements, we
needed latest 5.2 version of qt5, which was only available from master and
not from Dora, while meta-arago was generally Dora based. Since then meta-qt5
was updated to 5.2.1, and meta-arago has recently switched to Daisy - some
cleanup is still going on...
I think in order to clean up:
1) meta-arago:dora should switch back to 5.1.1
2) a daisy branch should be added to meta-arago (or daisy-devel) using 5.2.1
3) meta-arago:master should be 5.3.0
5.2.0 recipes should be deleted, or moved to an intermediate branch
(daisy-rc1?)
No.
So whats the plan?
Does it make sense to have different version numbers in meta-arago, than
in meta-qt5?
Is there a time schedule to have 5.2.1/5,3,0 support?
BR
Ulf Samuelsson
_______________________________________________
meta-arago mailing list
[email protected]
http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago
