> -----Original Message----- > From: Ulf Samuelsson [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 3:26 PM > To: Cooper Jr., Franklin; Dmytriyenko, Denys > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [meta-arago] Fwd: Fwd: Re: [meta-ti] Build of qtbase fails due to > no OpenGL libraries, but completes after cleaning qtbase. > > 2014-07-02 21:34, Cooper Jr., Franklin skrev: > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] [mailto:meta-arago- > >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Ulf Samuelsson > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 2:23 PM > >> To: Dmytriyenko, Denys > >> Cc: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [meta-arago] Fwd: Fwd: Re: [meta-ti] Build of qtbase > >> fails due to no OpenGL libraries, but completes after cleaning qtbase. > >> > >> 2014-07-02 21:18, Denys Dmytriyenko skrev: > >>> On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 09:13:16PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > >>>> 2014-07-02 20:13, Denys Dmytriyenko skrev: > >>>>> On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 08:05:09PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 07:21:24AM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > >>>>>>> When I build an image with QT5 using meta-arago, qtbase fails > >>>>>>> with a lot of error messages. > >>>>>>> This is the wrong mailing list - meta-ti has nothing to do with > >>>>>>> qtbase. > >>>>>>> Moreover, why are you still using 5.1.1? There were many fixes > >>>>>>> in > >>>>>>> Qt5 5.2.x and 5.3.x. Also, it depends on your setup and what > >>>>>>> layers and features you configure. Either way, it's a discussion > >>>>>>> for a distro layer, you can use meta-arago mailing list for that... > >>>>>> I looked through meta-arago and meta-qt5 about a month ago for > >> compatability. > >>>>>> I checked again today: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> meta-qt5/master = 5.3.0 > >>>>>> meta-qt5/daisy = 5.2.1 > >>>>>> meta-qt5/dora = 5.1.1 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> meta-arago/master = 5.2.0 > >>>>>> meta-arago/dora = 5.2.0 (used to be 5.1.1) > >>>>>> There is no meta-arago/daisy branch. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The only revision I could find which was available in both was 5.1.1. > >>>>>> and that is why I used it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It would make sense if the qt5 related recipes in meta-arago > >>>>>> matched > >> those in meta-qt5. > >>>>>> Now meta-arago is using 5.2.0 which is not present in any branch > >>>>>> of > >>>>>> meta-qt5 (did not check old branches, only dora and daisy). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I dont understand why the meta-arago:dora recipes for qt5 has > >>>>>> been updated from 5.1.1 to 5.2.0, thus making it incompatible > >>>>>> with meta- > >> qt5:dora. Isn't this a mistake. > >>>>> meta-qt5 for long time only had master, moreover, due to some > >>>>> requirements, we needed latest 5.2 version of qt5, which was only > >>>>> available from master and not from Dora, while meta-arago was > >>>>> generally Dora based. Since then meta-qt5 was updated to 5.2.1, > >>>>> and meta-arago has recently switched to Daisy - some cleanup is > >>>>> still going > >> on... > >>>> I think in order to clean up: > >>>> 1) meta-arago:dora should switch back to 5.1.1 > >>>> 2) a daisy branch should be added to meta-arago (or daisy-devel) > >>>> using 5.2.1 > >>>> 3) meta-arago:master should be 5.3.0 > >>>> > >>>> 5.2.0 recipes should be deleted, or moved to an intermediate branch > >>>> (daisy-rc1?) > >>> No. > >> So whats the plan? > >> Does it make sense to have different version numbers in meta-arago, > >> than in meta-qt5? > >> > >> Is there a time schedule to have 5.2.1/5,3,0 support? > > [Franklin] The way meta-qt5 and meta-arago works is indeed different > compared to other layers. Meta-arago master tracks meta-qt5 master. Meta- > arago dora tracks meta-arago daisy. I think we need to properly document > this and even include it in the README file but of course work on daisy is > still > being done so it might just be on someone's short term todo list. > > > > Ulf, > > Are you still having issues with Qt5 support when you use meta-qt5 master? > I have Beaglebone Black + LCD4 (from 4D systems) running > > meta-arago:dora (1 month old checkout using Qt-5.1.1) meta-qt5:dora > linux_ti_staging-3.12.20 > > Customer is currently developing on both AM335x and iMX6, and will make > final selection later this year. > > Customer wants to be Yocto-1.6 compatible and is using QT 5.2.1 for the > iMX6 development. > Would like to use the same or later for the Beaglebone Black. > > Mixing dora and daisy branches, if true is not intuitive. [Franklin] Ignore what I said look at Denys latest response. > > One issue which I need to investigate, is the colours. > At boot, the Penguin appears with Blue feet, and not Yellow/Orange and the > customer splash screen and applications also have the wrong colour. > [Franklin] I believe that color issue has to-do with the am335x errata http://www.ti.com/lit/er/sprz360f/sprz360f.pdf (page 8). The BBB is hooked up to display correctly in 16bpp mode but if you use 24bpp then your colors will look messed up. I recommend posting this question to e2e.ti.com and the right people can help you with this.
> I disabled the meta-arago psplash by > > BBMASK = "meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/psplash/" > > in 'local.conf' and there is no longer an '-arago' addition to the version > name. > > Have not had the time to study the issue further, but would appreciate ideas. > > > >> BR > >> Ulf Samuelsson > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> meta-arago mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago _______________________________________________ meta-arago mailing list [email protected] http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago
