On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 03:34:38PM -0400, Cooper Jr., Franklin wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:meta-arago- > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Ulf Samuelsson > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 2:23 PM > > To: Dmytriyenko, Denys > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [meta-arago] Fwd: Fwd: Re: [meta-ti] Build of qtbase fails due > > to > > no OpenGL libraries, but completes after cleaning qtbase. > > > > 2014-07-02 21:18, Denys Dmytriyenko skrev: > > > On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 09:13:16PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > > >> 2014-07-02 20:13, Denys Dmytriyenko skrev: > > >>> On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 08:05:09PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 07:21:24AM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > > >>>>> When I build an image with QT5 using meta-arago, qtbase fails with > > >>>>> a lot of error messages. > > >>>>> This is the wrong mailing list - meta-ti has nothing to do with > > >>>>> qtbase. > > >>>>> Moreover, why are you still using 5.1.1? There were many fixes in > > >>>>> Qt5 5.2.x and 5.3.x. Also, it depends on your setup and what > > >>>>> layers and features you configure. Either way, it's a discussion > > >>>>> for a distro layer, you can use meta-arago mailing list for that... > > >>>> I looked through meta-arago and meta-qt5 about a month ago for > > compatability. > > >>>> > > >>>> I checked again today: > > >>>> > > >>>> meta-qt5/master = 5.3.0 > > >>>> meta-qt5/daisy = 5.2.1 > > >>>> meta-qt5/dora = 5.1.1 > > >>>> > > >>>> meta-arago/master = 5.2.0 > > >>>> meta-arago/dora = 5.2.0 (used to be 5.1.1) > > >>>> There is no meta-arago/daisy branch. > > >>>> > > >>>> The only revision I could find which was available in both was 5.1.1. > > >>>> and that is why I used it. > > >>>> > > >>>> It would make sense if the qt5 related recipes in meta-arago matched > > those in meta-qt5. > > >>>> > > >>>> Now meta-arago is using 5.2.0 which is not present in any branch of > > >>>> meta-qt5 (did not check old branches, only dora and daisy). > > >>>> > > >>>> I dont understand why the meta-arago:dora recipes for qt5 has been > > >>>> updated from 5.1.1 to 5.2.0, thus making it incompatible with meta- > > qt5:dora. Isn't this a mistake. > > >>> meta-qt5 for long time only had master, moreover, due to some > > >>> requirements, we needed latest 5.2 version of qt5, which was only > > >>> available from master and not from Dora, while meta-arago was > > >>> generally Dora based. Since then meta-qt5 was updated to 5.2.1, and > > >>> meta-arago has recently switched to Daisy - some cleanup is still going > > on... > > >>> > > >> I think in order to clean up: > > >> 1) meta-arago:dora should switch back to 5.1.1 > > >> 2) a daisy branch should be added to meta-arago (or daisy-devel) > > >> using 5.2.1 > > >> 3) meta-arago:master should be 5.3.0 > > >> > > >> 5.2.0 recipes should be deleted, or moved to an intermediate branch > > >> (daisy-rc1?) > > > No. > > So whats the plan? > > Does it make sense to have different version numbers in meta-arago, than in > > meta-qt5? > > > > Is there a time schedule to have 5.2.1/5,3,0 support?
> [Franklin] The way meta-qt5 and meta-arago works is indeed different > compared to other layers. Meta-arago master tracks meta-qt5 master. > Meta-arago dora tracks meta-arago daisy. I think we need to properly What? Complete nonsense! > document this and even include it in the README file but of course work on > daisy is still being done so it might just be on someone's short term todo > list. > > Ulf, > Are you still having issues with Qt5 support when you use meta-qt5 master? > > > > BR > > Ulf Samuelsson > > > > _______________________________________________ > > meta-arago mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago _______________________________________________ meta-arago mailing list [email protected] http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago
