2014-07-02 22:26, Ulf Samuelsson skrev:
2014-07-02 21:34, Cooper Jr., Franklin skrev:
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:meta-arago-
[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ulf Samuelsson
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 2:23 PM
To: Dmytriyenko, Denys
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [meta-arago] Fwd: Fwd: Re: [meta-ti] Build of qtbase
fails due to
no OpenGL libraries, but completes after cleaning qtbase.
2014-07-02 21:18, Denys Dmytriyenko skrev:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 09:13:16PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
2014-07-02 20:13, Denys Dmytriyenko skrev:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 08:05:09PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 07:21:24AM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
When I build an image with QT5 using meta-arago, qtbase fails with
a lot of error messages.
This is the wrong mailing list - meta-ti has nothing to do with
qtbase.
Moreover, why are you still using 5.1.1? There were many fixes in
Qt5 5.2.x and 5.3.x. Also, it depends on your setup and what
layers and features you configure. Either way, it's a discussion
for a distro layer, you can use meta-arago mailing list for
that...
I looked through meta-arago and meta-qt5 about a month ago for
compatability.
I checked again today:
meta-qt5/master = 5.3.0
meta-qt5/daisy = 5.2.1
meta-qt5/dora = 5.1.1
meta-arago/master = 5.2.0
meta-arago/dora = 5.2.0 (used to be 5.1.1)
There is no meta-arago/daisy branch.
The only revision I could find which was available in both was
5.1.1.
and that is why I used it.
It would make sense if the qt5 related recipes in meta-arago
matched
those in meta-qt5.
Now meta-arago is using 5.2.0 which is not present in any branch of
meta-qt5 (did not check old branches, only dora and daisy).
I dont understand why the meta-arago:dora recipes for qt5 has been
updated from 5.1.1 to 5.2.0, thus making it incompatible with meta-
qt5:dora. Isn't this a mistake.
meta-qt5 for long time only had master, moreover, due to some
requirements, we needed latest 5.2 version of qt5, which was only
available from master and not from Dora, while meta-arago was
generally Dora based. Since then meta-qt5 was updated to 5.2.1, and
meta-arago has recently switched to Daisy - some cleanup is still
going
on...
I think in order to clean up:
1) meta-arago:dora should switch back to 5.1.1
2) a daisy branch should be added to meta-arago (or daisy-devel)
using 5.2.1
3) meta-arago:master should be 5.3.0
5.2.0 recipes should be deleted, or moved to an intermediate branch
(daisy-rc1?)
No.
So whats the plan?
Does it make sense to have different version numbers in meta-arago,
than in
meta-qt5?
Is there a time schedule to have 5.2.1/5,3,0 support?
[Franklin] The way meta-qt5 and meta-arago works is indeed different
compared to other layers. Meta-arago master tracks meta-qt5 master.
Meta-arago dora tracks meta-arago daisy. I think we need to properly
document this and even include it in the README file but of course
work on daisy is still being done so it might just be on someone's
short term todo list.
Ulf,
Are you still having issues with Qt5 support when you use meta-qt5
master?
I have Beaglebone Black + LCD4 (from 4D systems) running
meta-arago:dora (1 month old checkout using Qt-5.1.1)
meta-qt5:dora
linux_ti_staging-3.12.20
Think I was to quick here. Went back and rechecked.
According to Documentation, meta-arago is not yet compatible with daisy,
so I checked what support is available in meta-qt5:dora and this is 5.1.1.
I decided to use this version, and converted the existing 5.2.0 support
in meta-arago:dora
to 5.1.1 and added to a "bugfix" layer which overrides meta-arago..
BR
Ulf
Customer is currently developing on both AM335x and iMX6,
and will make final selection later this year.
Customer wants to be Yocto-1.6 compatible and is using QT 5.2.1 for
the iMX6 development.
Would like to use the same or later for the Beaglebone Black.
Mixing dora and daisy branches, if true is not intuitive.
One issue which I need to investigate, is the colours.
At boot, the Penguin appears with Blue feet, and not Yellow/Orange
and the customer splash screen and applications also have the wrong
colour.
I disabled the meta-arago psplash by
BBMASK = "meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/psplash/"
in 'local.conf' and there is no longer an '-arago' addition to the
version name.
Have not had the time to study the issue further, but would appreciate
ideas.
BR
Ulf Samuelsson
_______________________________________________
meta-arago mailing list
[email protected]
http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago
_______________________________________________
meta-arago mailing list
[email protected]
http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago
_______________________________________________
meta-arago mailing list
[email protected]
http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago
