On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Daiane Angolini <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:03 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> From: Chunrong Guo <[email protected]> > > I think your patch highlighted a problem. > > I agree with having a custom-licenses directory. But when this patch > is merged, we are going to have 2 different EULAs in different places. > > And one is called Freescale-EULA > > and the other EULA > > So, I think it would be better to have EULA copied into > custom-licenses, and a better name should be used for both EULA files. > > > What do you think?
Fully agree. We need to check: * if both are the same or not * put in place the system to ask for whitelist each * move to LICENSE_WHITELIST mechanishm * rework unpack binary to check for each EULA when appropriate -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
