On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Daiane Angolini <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:03 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> From: Chunrong Guo <[email protected]> >> >> I think your patch highlighted a problem. >> >> I agree with having a custom-licenses directory. But when this patch >> is merged, we are going to have 2 different EULAs in different places. >> >> And one is called Freescale-EULA >> >> and the other EULA >> >> So, I think it would be better to have EULA copied into >> custom-licenses, and a better name should be used for both EULA files. >> >> >> What do you think? > > Fully agree. We need to check: > > * if both are the same or not > * put in place the system to ask for whitelist each > * move to LICENSE_WHITELIST mechanishm > * rework unpack binary to check for each EULA when appropriate
* double check which one to display at first source setup-environment time Daiane > > -- > Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems > http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br > Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
