On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 1:08 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree to manage the license files in a unified manner. > > The EULA in fsl-arm layer includes both Freescale EULA content and some other > 3rd party license content, Freescale-EULA only includes the Freescale EULA > content.
Maybe it'd be better to split it out? > Is there detailed description of the license whitelist mechanism? I am > interested in whether it is applicable for LS1 and PPC packages which are > under Freescale EULA or other proprietary license. No; but I can support any improvement we may need on the technical side. I think the first thing we ought to do is to identify how to deal with the license and later adapt the code for it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
