On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Ting Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 9:39 PM >> To: Ting Liu <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-freescale-layer][PATCH 01/67] remove >> not supported e500v2 machines >> >> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 7:41 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> > From: Ting Liu <[email protected]> >> > >> > Remove the below machines which are not supported/tested: >> > bsc9131rdb, bsc9132qds, p1010rdb, p1020rdb, p1021rdb, p1022ds >> > p1023rdb, p1025twr, p2020rdb >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Ting Liu <[email protected]> >> >> i understand why you are doing this but I don't support this. There are users >> out there using those and as such NXP should keep those supported. We use >> same rule for i.MX and what we do is moving the old BSP machines for >> mainline kernel/u-boot so people has at least an upgrade path. > [Liu Ting-B28495] I understand your points. But these boards are not tested > with the latest kernel/u-boot/fm-ucode/qe-ucode/etc. > We want to remove them to avoid confusion. > > It is easy to add back the machine configuration files. The recipes for > kernel/u-boot/etc. should be rolled back to the previous revision on which > these boards are supported too. Anyway, this need effort to verify, including > build and function.
I am not the owner of those machines, on the BSP, so I cannot block the removal. For the i.MX I always preferred to move the machines for the mainline kernel/u-boot and keep them around so people could use and improve them. This was a way to empower the community and provide a long term solution for our users. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
