On 07/13/2016 06:56 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Ting Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 9:39 PM
To: Ting Liu <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-freescale-layer][PATCH 01/67] remove
not supported e500v2 machines
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 7:41 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Ting Liu <[email protected]>
Remove the below machines which are not supported/tested:
bsc9131rdb, bsc9132qds, p1010rdb, p1020rdb, p1021rdb, p1022ds
p1023rdb, p1025twr, p2020rdb
Signed-off-by: Ting Liu <[email protected]>
i understand why you are doing this but I don't support this. There are users
out there using those and as such NXP should keep those supported. We use
same rule for i.MX and what we do is moving the old BSP machines for
mainline kernel/u-boot so people has at least an upgrade path.
[Liu Ting-B28495] I understand your points. But these boards are not tested
with the latest kernel/u-boot/fm-ucode/qe-ucode/etc.
We want to remove them to avoid confusion.
It is easy to add back the machine configuration files. The recipes for
kernel/u-boot/etc. should be rolled back to the previous revision on which
these boards are supported too. Anyway, this need effort to verify, including
build and function.
I am not the owner of those machines, on the BSP, so I cannot block
the removal. For the i.MX I always preferred to move the machines for
the mainline kernel/u-boot and keep them around so people could use
and improve them. This was a way to empower the community and provide
a long term solution for our users.
Once things stabilize, I would like to patch back in support for the
p1010rdb and t1040rdb-64b. Let me know if there is an objection to this.
--
_______________________________________________
meta-freescale mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
