Hello Georg, On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 1:58 PM, georg <g968...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 16/10/2017 15:46, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:05 AM, georg <g968...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 6:27 AM, georg <g968...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> I have started a script this weekend which tries to do a git clone with >>>>> --mirror in a loop every hour till it succeeds. This was working, I have >>>>> now a cloned linux-imx.git repository which I can use in all future >>>>> builds. >>>>> >>>>> Nonetheless it's very annoying to not be able to do a simple "bitbake >>>>> core-image-minimal" with a standard freescale evaluation board. >>>> >>>> I am curious to know which machine as we use linux-fslc-imx for most >>>> machines as default. >>>> >>> Ah, that's interesting. I thought it's the same repository for all >>> freescale processors. It's for imx6ull. >> >> If you can, test rocko and change the machine to use u-boot-fslc and >> linux-fslc-imx so we confirm it works there. If it does, we can >> change. >> > Hello, > > I have done my previous tests on master (morty doesn't support imx6ull). > > So if have tested rocko and change this file: > meta-freescale/conf/machine/imx6ullevk.conf. I have removed the > following lines: > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_u-boot = "u-boot-imx" > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/bootloader = "u-boot-imx" > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-imx" > > It seems that imx-base.inc let chose bitbake u-boot-fslc and linux-fslc-imx. > I have u-boot-fslc-v2017.09+gitAUTOINC+a6a15fedd1-r0 and > linux-fslc-imx-4.1-2.0.x+gitAUTOINC+6c1ad49339-r0 in my buildstats. So > now it's using u-boot-fslc and linux-fslc-imx. > > The download is slow too, but without connection errors. After several > hours, the kernel sources are downloaded. > > The build is successful, but boot sucks. U-boot boots correctly, but not > linux. I have a reboot without any kernel trace near the end of the > boot, like that: > >>Configuring network interfaces... fec 20b4000.ethernet eth0: Freescale >>FEC PHY driver [Micrel KSZ8081 or KSZ8091] >>(mii_bus:phy_addr=20b4000.ethernet:01, irq=-1) >>IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready >>udhcpc (v1.24.1) started >>Sending discover... >>Sending discover... >>fec 20b4000.ethernet eth0: Link is Up - 100Mbps/Full - flow control >rx/tx >>IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready >>Sending discover... >> >> >>U-Boot 2017.09+fslc+ga6a15fe (Oct 17 2017 - 13:56:43 +0200) > > I have no idea why. There is no kernel crash trace so it's perhaps > something like the watchdog.
Thanks for running the tests. I did look about differences and you did test against kernel 4.9 it seems. I'd like to know if you can run same test but against linux-fslc (it uses 4.13 mainline). Is it possible? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
