Hello Otavio, On 17/10/2017 18:28, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello Georg, > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 1:58 PM, georg <g968...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 16/10/2017 15:46, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:05 AM, georg <g968...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 6:27 AM, georg <g968...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> I have started a script this weekend which tries to do a git clone with >>>>>> --mirror in a loop every hour till it succeeds. This was working, I have >>>>>> now a cloned linux-imx.git repository which I can use in all future >>>>>> builds. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nonetheless it's very annoying to not be able to do a simple "bitbake >>>>>> core-image-minimal" with a standard freescale evaluation board. >>>>> >>>>> I am curious to know which machine as we use linux-fslc-imx for most >>>>> machines as default. >>>>> >>>> Ah, that's interesting. I thought it's the same repository for all >>>> freescale processors. It's for imx6ull. >>> >>> If you can, test rocko and change the machine to use u-boot-fslc and >>> linux-fslc-imx so we confirm it works there. If it does, we can >>> change. >>> >> Hello, >> >> I have done my previous tests on master (morty doesn't support imx6ull). >> >> So if have tested rocko and change this file: >> meta-freescale/conf/machine/imx6ullevk.conf. I have removed the >> following lines: >> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_u-boot = "u-boot-imx" >> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/bootloader = "u-boot-imx" >> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-imx" >> >> It seems that imx-base.inc let chose bitbake u-boot-fslc and linux-fslc-imx. >> I have u-boot-fslc-v2017.09+gitAUTOINC+a6a15fedd1-r0 and >> linux-fslc-imx-4.1-2.0.x+gitAUTOINC+6c1ad49339-r0 in my buildstats. So >> now it's using u-boot-fslc and linux-fslc-imx. >> >> The download is slow too, but without connection errors. After several >> hours, the kernel sources are downloaded. >> >> The build is successful, but boot sucks. U-boot boots correctly, but not >> linux. I have a reboot without any kernel trace near the end of the >> boot, like that: >> >>> Configuring network interfaces... fec 20b4000.ethernet eth0: Freescale >>> FEC PHY driver [Micrel KSZ8081 or KSZ8091] >>> (mii_bus:phy_addr=20b4000.ethernet:01, irq=-1) >>> IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready >>> udhcpc (v1.24.1) started >>> Sending discover... >>> Sending discover... >>> fec 20b4000.ethernet eth0: Link is Up - 100Mbps/Full - flow control >rx/tx >>> IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready >>> Sending discover... >>> >>> >>> U-Boot 2017.09+fslc+ga6a15fe (Oct 17 2017 - 13:56:43 +0200) >> >> I have no idea why. There is no kernel crash trace so it's perhaps >> something like the watchdog. > > Thanks for running the tests. > > I did look about differences and you did test against kernel 4.9 it seems. > > I'd like to know if you can run same test but against linux-fslc (it > uses 4.13 mainline). Is it possible? >
I have already seen in the release-notes that there are many different kernel versions. It's not obvious to me which version to use for my future project. I think mainline kernel is better for latest bugfixes. Is my listing of kernels from freescale to mainline at the rate of changes to mainline correct?: * linux-imx * linux-fslc-imx * linux-fslc * mainline Thats just to know why this two version exist (linux-fslc-imx and linux-fslc). For the test I have added the following lines to machine/imx6ullevk.conf: PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-fslc" PREFERRED_PROVIDER_kernel = "linux-fslc" Not sure if the .._virtual... line is needed but it seems to use the right kernel version. I get my log in: build/tmp/work/imx6ullevk-poky-linux-gnueabi/linux-fslc/4.13+gitAUTOINC+e12ac43313-r0/temp/log.do_compile.30043 I get the following compilation error: | make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-14x14-evk-btwifi.dtb'. Stop. | arch/arm/Makefile:341: recipe for target 'imx6ull-14x14-evk-btwifi.dtb' failed | make[2]: *** [imx6ull-14x14-evk-btwifi.dtb] Error 2 | Makefile:145: recipe for target 'sub-make' failed | make[1]: *** [sub-make] Error 2 | Makefile:24: recipe for target '__sub-make' failed | make: *** [__sub-make] Error 2 | ERROR: oe_runmake failed It seems that imx6ull-14x14-evk-btwifi.dtb is missing. -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
