>> >> He clearly believes that MetaCard is a powerful tool somewhat let
>>>> down by its current user interface in two respects - a) the interface
>>>> presented to the developer, and b) its lack of complete adherence to
>> >> Mac U-I guidelines.
>>The interface presented to the developer... give me a break.
>>Best applications are most likely built in environments with no interface.
>
>no interface? wtf? there is *no* software without an interface. if
>there was, you couldn't do anything with it. DOS has an interface,
>too. even your car stereo has an interface. everything you use has
>one. but MetaCard's Interface is truly the one thing that keeps it
>from getting accepted more widely, especially on the mac side of
>things. and there are lots of mac users who are still searching for a
>replacement for hypercard.
If those mac users want to use most of what they already know and accept getting used
to a different development environment they should look no farther.
>
>lucas
>
>Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
>Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
>Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not this list.
>
>
Regards, Andu
__________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not this list.
