I have had a great deal of proplems also with the focus color and border 
along with transversalOn, etc. in cases when I do not want the focus.  
Anything that will let me turn this off would be greatly appreciated.

Philip Chumbley

<< >>>
 >>>  If I set the focusColor of a field to empty, it uses the focusColor of 
its
 >>>  owner.  But in my layout I don't want the focusColor to show at all -- 
how
 >>>  can I turn it off?
 >>
 >>  I assume you're using 2.4 on a Mac and are talking about the focus
 >>  border.  The only way to do this is to set the look and feel to
 >>  Windows 95.  And before you say "but that doesn't look right on a
 >>  Mac", please consider than a field without a focus border doesn't
 >>  either, at least according to the HIG ;-)
 >
 >You may want to reconsider whether that should be optional:   I'm making a
 >multi-column list, so to emulate a true multi-column list object we need to
 >place several fields side by side, one for each column.    Whenever the user
 >clicks on a culumn, its edge hilites due to this property.  If that doesn't
 >go away, I can't do cropped list display in MC at all -- it'll kill three of
 >my biggest client projects!
 
 This is a big issue. There are many situations where a focus border 
 isn't wanted. Educational applications come to mind immediately. For 
 example, for young kids, imagine you want the learners to input some 
 text in a field that is designed to look like a notebook. Switching 
 to Windows Look and Feel *might* work, but we then have to think 
 through all the consequences of doing that. Being able to have plain 
 and undecorated editable text fields is surely a basic requirement 
 for a multimedia development tool.
 
 The HIG argument makes no sense. Guidleines are what you follow when 
 you have no reason to do things differently. I want to be able to 
 follow them, but not forced to. >>

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not this list.

Reply via email to